Paula Radcliffe has sparked controversy with her recent comments on the inclusion of convicted child rapist Steven van de Velde in the Dutch Olympic team.
What happened?
Radcliffe stated that Van de Velde, who was 19 at the time of the crime, had served his jail time and deserved a second chance, wishing him "the best of luck".
She later retracted her support after being informed of the full facts, acknowledging she had spoken without full possession of the facts.
The incident has raised questions about Radcliffe's judgment and views as a commentator.
Why it matters for Paula Radcliffe
As a former world champion distance runner and current BBC athletics commentator, Radcliffe's opinions carry weight, but her recent comments have been criticized for being "odd" and "not quite on track".
Her defense of coach Alberto Salazar, who was involved in a doping scandal, has also been questioned, given her own history with unexpected blood tests in 2015.
What comes next?
Radcliffe's comments on South African athlete Caster Semenya's naturally high levels of testosterone have also sparked controversy, with many criticizing her for questioning Semenya's right to compete in female events.
And while Radcliffe has apologized for her recent comments, the incident has left many wondering about her ability to provide balanced and informed commentary.
But Radcliffe's passion and willingness to speak her mind are undeniable, even if her views are sometimes controversial.
So what does this mean for Radcliffe's future as a commentator?
The fact that she has been involved in several high-profile controversies in recent years suggests that she may need to be more careful with her words.
Radcliffe's career as an athlete was marked by her impressive performances, including her 2003 London Marathon win.
But as a commentator, she faces a different kind of challenge, one that requires her to balance her opinions with sensitivity and respect for the athletes and issues she is commenting on.